FAIRSIGHT AI Audit Framework

Comprehensive AI ethics and fairness evaluation

The Problem

Organizations deploying AI systems face increasing regulatory pressure and public scrutiny around algorithmic fairness. Existing audit approaches are often manual, inconsistent, and fail to catch systematic biases until they cause real-world harm.

The challenge is building an audit framework that scales across diverse AI systems while providing actionable, contextualized recommendations rather than generic compliance checklists.

Visual Architecture

Approach

Multi-Dimensional Fairness Metrics: Evaluate systems across group fairness, individual fairness, and counterfactual fairness dimensions, recognizing that different contexts require different definitions of fairness.

Automated Bias Detection: Machine learning-powered detection of potential bias patterns in training data, model outputs, and decision pathways with explainable evidence.

Stakeholder Impact Mapping: Systematic identification of affected stakeholder groups and modeling of differential impacts across demographic segments.

Continuous Monitoring: Real-time drift detection and alerting when fairness metrics degrade beyond acceptable thresholds in production.

Ethical Considerations

Fairness Definition Selection: Different fairness metrics can be mutually exclusive. The framework must be transparent about which definitions are being applied and why.

False Sense of Security: Passing an audit doesn't guarantee a system is fair—it means it passed specific tests. How do we communicate this nuance?

Audit Access: Who should have access to detailed audit results? There are tensions between transparency and competitive advantage.

Remediation Guidance: Finding bias is only useful if there are paths to fix it. How do we provide actionable guidance, not just problem identification?

Architecture

▸Data Ingestion Pipeline: Connectors for major ML platforms with privacy-preserving data handling
▸Fairness Metric Engine: Configurable metrics library with statistical significance testing
▸Bias Pattern Detector: Trained models for identifying common bias patterns with explanation generation
▸Report Generator: Automated audit report creation with regulatory compliance mapping
▸Dashboard Interface: Real-time monitoring with drill-down capabilities and trend analysis

Key Insights

1Fairness is contextual—the same metric may be appropriate in one domain and harmful in another
2Audit frequency matters as much as audit quality; point-in-time audits miss drift
3Stakeholder engagement improves audit quality by surfacing blind spots in metric selection

Have questions about this approach?

Interface with the System

Back to all work